I
am sure we have all heard the phrase, "authentic assessment."
What's all the hype? Well, first of all, think about what assessment
is. Danny Callison says that assessment "is any systematic approach
for collecting information on student learning and performance, usually
based on different sources of evidence" (Key Words, Concepts
and Methods, p. 119). In other words, it is an ongoing gathering
of information about the learning process. Sharon Croatney makes the
distinction between assessment and "evaluation, which implies judgment,
often at the end of a project" (Curriculum Connections,
p. 157). It is only through authentic assessment, then, that
we can actually make decisions about what is working and what is not
and adjust our teaching strategies accordingly.
The TAKS test then is really an evaluative tool. The results can be
used to assess instruction, but usually too late to make any difference
in the current year. Therefore it is important to assess learning throughout
the year in ways that represent what is being taught. In other words,
a multiple choice test can assess some aspects of learning, but will
do little to yield any information as to why students did or
did not learn.
Other methods of assessment can offer more insight into the thinking
process students go through. Consider some of the following types of
assessment and how they might offer other types of feedback in your
content area:
Rubrics: by breaking a task down into its
individual components, students have a grater idea of the behaviors
associated with quality work. Many of you are already familiar with
Rubistar
rubric generator . It is worth the effort to learn how to use this
resource.
Checklists: Similar to a rubric, these
can also help students look at the process more carefully as well as
the product and allow for teachers to get a better grasp of where the
student is succeeding and where she is not. There is an checklist
generator available at 4teachers.org.
Learning Log: Although these can be time-consuming
for a teacher to monitor, they give the greatest opportunity for students
to reflect and report their experiences with the learning process.
Conferencing: The individualized feedback
that can come from conferencing with a student, especially in the midst
of a large project, can give some of the greatest opportunities for
assessing learning and guiding the process.
Portfolios: A collection of work can give
a much greater overview than any individual element.
Finally, authentic assessment should also be ongoing so that students
and teachers have time to "revise, rethink, reflect, and do again"
(Coatney, p. 161). And, if done with assessing thinking skills in mind,
authentic assessment can be instructional as students learn as they
reflect. Finally, authentic assessment is also empowering as students
have a greater participation in their own learning than can be provided
simply with test-type evaluation.
References and other readings on Assessment:
Callison, Daniel.Key Words, Concepts and Methods for Information
Age Instruction. Baltimore: LMC Associates, 2002.
Coatney, Sharon. "Assessment for Learning." Curriculum
Connections Through the Library. Barbara K Stripling and Sandra
Hughes-Hassell, eds. Westport, Conn: Libraries Unlimited, 2003.
Harada, Violet H. and Joan M. Yoshina. Inquiry Learning Through
Librarian-Teacher Partnerships. Worthington, OH: Linworth Publishing,
2004.